By Nicole J
📝 Overall Score: 3.3 / 5
👙 Worn on: Period Day 1
👩🏻 Reviewer: Nicole J
See description at the bottom of this post to understand our rating system.
1) Absorbency: 2.0 / 5.0
2) Comfort: 4.0 / 5.0
3) Design: 3.5 / 5.0
4) Accessibility: 5.0 / 5.0
5) Impact: 1.0 / 5.0
Overall Rating: 3.3 / 5.0
This pad was not bad. It was this thick and fluffy, but still breathable. I personally prefer thinner pads with no wing (because it doesn’t feel like it’s there), so this was a bit too thick for my preference. I did like that it didn’t have a wing, and the adhesive was very sticky so it did not move around. It was not irritating or itchy, but I think it was unnecessary to add the daun sirih extract (because it’s just more chemical /artificial additives) and I always prefer my pads to be as minimal ingredients as possible (no fragrance, no chemicals). When we did the blot test, the pad’s absorption was not as good as the others so it wasn’t as dry too. It is probably better for medium day-time flow that is not too heavy. It is affordable and easily available in many stores.
Absorbency test after 4 teaspoons of blood.
First blot on left & second blot on right.
#NonaTries... A lot of products!
There are so many menstrual products available these days, from pads and tampons to menstrual cups and period panties. Which one is best for you? Nona puts them all to the test!
Nona will be reviewing dozens of period product types and brands in a series called #NonaTries. The products will be tested by the Nona team. To read more about how we review the products, check out our post: #NonaTries Explained.
Are there any other products you want us to test? Let us know!